Julius Caesar

[JAGeJezz]

Did you know that someone actually researched his assassination and now believes that Caesar might have used the Senate to kill him instead of killing himself because of his epilepsy

[Ace]

caesar didnt' kill himself in the first place because of his epilepsy

[JAGeExtant4Now]

You didn't read what it said did you Ace. It didn't say that Caesar killed him self, it said someone researched his assasination and found that it was possible that Caesar may have used the senate to die instead of everyone knowing about his epilepsy. It is a known fact that Caesar was killed by the senate, but this new research shows that he knew of the senates polt to kill him. So knowing that he willingly went to the senate knowing he was going to die so that word of his illness wouldn't get out if it already hadn't gotten out. Unless they can prove that I will still believe that Caesar was killed by the senate due to the fact that the senate was corrupted and didnt want to have a better world for the people. It goes back to the new study and findings of the mystery of King Arthur. Now they're saying that Authur was a Roman soldier, BLAH show me the evidence. I am all up for new information and new findings in history like Caesar and King Arthur, but show me the evidence, show me the proof, don't just speculate or tell me something of what someone would believe it to be.

[JAGeBoyle]

I didnt understand it the way it was said either I belived what ace did at the time of reading it.

[Ace]

yeah, i was very confused at what he said, and i read it at like 6:30 AM :(

but i dont really believe it, there is only so much historian can do, i mean this even took place in the B.C's, there arne't that many records left behind but that of the book shakespeare used to write the play. Most of it is guess work and speculation.

[JAGeExtant4Now]

Thats cool, sometimes I have trouble understanding what my wife says to me LOL Please don't kill me sweetie, I love you.

[Fanlaen]

Historians have nothing to historicly correct since its all been done so theyre making stuff up.

Apparently shakespeare didnt write his plays somebody else did according to some historians!

[Ace]

according to me, a historian, fanalen was born in a tool shed underneath a tractor and grew up with wild bears :p

[Fanlaen]

Well since everything in the past is defined as "History" they're probably gonna start writing books about yesterday's events....
"The Rain drop that fell"

[JAGeJezz]

Respectful historians use science methods to figure out what happened. They look at the artifacts and records from that time period, and sometimes even the remains of people that lived there. If things are preserved it makes the job easier. What historians come up with are always suggestions for the most part and will always be because the only people who really know are dead. However to me some are very accurate. But there are some that just rewrite history to their liking. I am not the only one who doesn't make sense sweetie (Extant). I have to explain you things too you every now and then.

[Ace]

They look at the artifacts and records from that time period

I'm sure they're going to find Brutus's & Cassius's dagger buried in the ground.


and sometimes even the remains of people that lived there.

Yup, and we all know how they found Caesar's body (bones) and the multiple stabs on his body...and several broken ribs..uhh no


I just think it's a load of shit guesstimating what happened back the in Rome when there are no artifacts or evidence other than written records.

I think this historian is just wanting some attention by refuting a popular tragedy.

[JAGeCyBeR_PhEnE]

alright ace, she just made a statment there is no reason to attack what she said with sarcasam. If i am misreading the way that was written in your last post sorry, but she just was stating how some historians do things. Also the way i read her first post was saying that some one did this not that she belives it herself.

[Ace]

i didnt mean it in a mean way lol, guess it just came of that way